Is Video or Phone Interpreting Better for a Busy Emergency Room?

Close-up of headset and computer an interpreter uses for video or phone sessions in healthcare
Close-up of headset and computer an interpreter uses for video or phone sessions in healthcare

Most ERs use a hybrid system, implementing both over-the-phone interpreting (OPI) and video remote interpreting (VRI) 24/7 for different cases. They often have the highest demand of any department for immediate interpreter access. VRI is typically better for a busy emergency room’s complex medical situations, and OPI is generally better for triage tasks or situations requiring speed.

When Is Video Interpreting the Best Option?

Video interpreting is best for situations that involve multiple steps, detailed information, sensitive interactions, or nuanced explanations, such as the following:

  • Explaining a complicated diagnosis
  • Outlining multistage treatment plans
  • Discussing a medication’s potential side effects
  • Delivering difficult news, such as a death or severe prognosis
  • Referring to X-ray images, MRI scans, diagrams, consent forms, or charts in a patient interaction
  • Communicating with children
  • For patients or family members who are deaf or hard of hearing

Video interpreting is beneficial in the listed situations because healthcare providers and interpreters can use visual cues to clarify complex medical terminology or procedures. This method also provides a more personal connection than phone interpreting, allowing providers to convey empathy and trust through their interactions.

Effective VRI requires a reliable internet connection, a camera and mic, and hardware such as an iPad.

When Is Phone Interpreting the Best Option?

Phone interpreting is the best option for these on-demand, high-speed situations:

  • Assessing a patient’s condition during initial triage, asking questions about pain, allergies, and medical history
  • Quickly determining a patient’s vital symptoms to stabilize them
  • Obtaining immediate consent for life-saving procedures
  • Gathering basic information and confirming identity during registration
  • Questioning family members about an unresponsive patient’s medical history or the circumstances of an incident

Phone interpreting is often the fastest way to connect with patients in a different language, and it works well in busy environments where a device may not be immediately available.

OPI is often a more cost-effective solution. Video interpreting generally costs more per minute because it involves a visual element for the interpreter and technology overhead. Even so, many healthcare organizations choose to use it in situations where seeing the interpreter helps communication feel clearer and more inclusive for the patient.

ModalityVideo Remote InterpretingOver-the-Phone Interpreting
Best forConversations that benefit from visual communication and human connectionRapid, high-volume communication in emergency settings
Recommended usesExplaining complex diagnoses Reviewing treatment plans Discussing imaging, charts, or forms Sensitive conversations Pediatric communication Interactions with deaf patients and families who use ASL Situations where visual cues improve clarityInitial triage Immediate symptom assessment Registration and intake Fast consent communication Basic medical history collection For languages of limited diffusion
Why providers use itVisual communication can improve understanding and reduce confusion during more detailed patient interactionsPhone interpreting helps staff connect quickly without locating equipment or setting up video devices during urgent situations

Why Many Emergency Rooms Use Both Phone and Video Interpreting

Many emergency rooms use both phone and video interpreting because no single interpreting modality is inherently superior. The hybrid model’s power lies in strategic selection, i.e., choosing the right tool for the specific clinical scenario.

Emergency departments handle a wide range of communication needs, from rapid intake to complex or sensitive conversations. Because those needs can vary significantly from one interaction to the next, staff benefit from having both modalities available.

Language access professionals should provide their clinical staff with best practices on when to use which modality based on clinical scenarios, communication complexity, and practical considerations.

Equip Your Emergency Room with Seamless Video and Phone Interpreting Solutions

When you manage a busy emergency room, you need an interpretation solution that fits fast-paced emergency workflows. Certified Languages International offers versatile remote interpreting services, offering 24/7 on-demand phone interpreting and video remote interpreting through our MERFi® platform. Contact us to request a quote and learn more about our interpreting solutions.

Equip Your Emergency Room with Seamless Video and Phone Interpreting Solutions
Table of Contents:

Ready to Get Started?

Continue Reading

With more than 25 million people in the United States having a non-English language preference (NELP), choosing an interpreting partner...

A video remote interpreting (VRI) vendor allows hospitals to rapidly connect interpreters to deaf, hard-of-hearing, or non-English language preference (NELP)...

Today’s healthcare RFPs for remote interpreting services require more than pricing comparisons. Explore the key questions procurement teams and healthcare...